"Do
you have five minutes to explain something to me?" asked a familiar voice on the other end of the line.
"Sure,"
I replied. "What's on your mind?"
"Somebody
wants me to explain this Presbyterian decision on marriage ceremonies … allowing
ministers to do same-sex weddings … and whether we're going to do them in our
church. Tell me what I need to know about that."
It
was a fair question, some would say an important question, but it was not an
easy question, especially since for years the answer has been an unequivocal "No, we cannot and will not have same-gender wedding ceremonies in our
church."
I
explained that for those of us in North Carolina the answer is the same now as
it has always been: We cannot perform same-gender marriages in our church.
Period. End of discussion.
"But,
I thought the New York Times reported that you could? Which is it? Can you
perform same-gender wedding ceremonies or not?"
"Do
you mind my asking if you're a Republican or Democrat?"
"Yes,
I do mind," he said. "Why does it matter?"
"Because
the best way to explain this is in terms of states rights. Up to this point, local
congregation have enjoyed no 'states rights" on this issue. All
congregations, ministers, and elders in all states, no matter their personal
preferences or convictions, had to follow national law. Beginning today,
however, some local rights are available. In other words, if you're Republican,
you'll probably like this change, favorable as Republicans are toward states
rights."
"Explain
this a bit more, please."
"OK.
In states where same-gender marriage is legal, the local minister is now
allowed to conduct a same-gender wedding with the approval of the local
Session."
"But
I thought the Session already had to approve every marriage ceremony," he
said.
"They
do."
"So
the only thing different is that now the Session can approve conducting a
same-gender wedding?"
"That's
right," I said, "but not in North Carolina. It has to be legal
in the state. So, our Session cannot approve them."
Then
he got to the point: "What do you think about all this?
I
said, "It boils down to this: I trust our elders. In 25 years of
ministry, I've seen elders make wise, spirit-led decisions time after time. I
think they should have the autonomy needed to make faithful decisions according the Spirit's leading, but I'm a 'states rights' kind of guy. I don't need -- or
want -- a cumbersome national bureaucracy to tell me the right thing to do in
my local context. Does that help?"
"Some."
he said," But I may need more than five minutes next time."
No comments:
Post a Comment